Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission reviews broad zoning update, debates ADU rules and other changes
Summary
Staff presented a comprehensive zoning ordinance update including new accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rules, limits on detached accessory buildings, rules for electric vehicle charging, temporary uses, and short‑term rental permitting; commissioners probed owner‑occupancy requirements, minimum ADU sizes, signage for home occupations and enforcement concerns.
City staff presented a draft overhaul of the zoning ordinance that would, among other changes, add a clear framework for accessory dwelling units (ADUs), limit the number of detached accessory buildings, introduce a section on electric vehicle charging as an accessory use, and formalize short‑term rental permitting.
On ADUs, staff explained that the draft allows ADUs by right in R2 and R3 districts and by special use in R1, but proposed an owner‑occupancy requirement intended to reduce the risk that already heavily rented properties would be further subdivided into additional rentals. The draft also sets maximum ADU size (no larger than one‑third of the primary dwelling) and requires connection to municipal water and wastewater. Commissioners asked staff to consider adding a minimum ADU floor area or other clarifications to prevent substandard conversions and discussed inspection triggers for rented vs. owner‑occupied units.
Commissioners also reviewed limits on detached accessory buildings (maximum three detached accessory buildings per residential lot), clarified rules for fences and projections, and discussed a new allowance for private electric vehicle charging installations (subject to building and electrical codes). Staff noted stormwater language will be refined with the city engineer and that floodplain and wellhead protection language had been added where relevant.
Several commissioners asked for more detail or revision on specific points: whether the owner‑occupancy requirement should apply in R2/R3, whether a minimum ADU size should be added to deter tiny nonconforming living spaces, clearer cross‑references to the city noise and building codes for solar and EV equipment, and whether minor home‑occupation signage standards were appropriate. Staff said some sections were draft placeholders and that definition language (for primary vs. accessory dwelling units and family definitions) would be finalized in a later review.
Staff said a grant deadline requires an accelerated schedule to finalize the ordinance by year‑end, and the planning commission signaled willingness to meet more frequently to complete the update.
