Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surplus Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission postpones decision on sale of Berglin House at 218 Winter Avenue
Summary
The commission paused consideration of declaring the Berglin House surplus, citing the need for a historic‑commission status letter, an inventory and disposition plan for museum items, operating cost data and tenant relocation assurances; members voted to postpone pending that additional information.
The Big Rapids Planning Commission voted to postpone action on whether to recommend the city declare the Berglin House at 218 Winter Avenue surplus and available for sale, after commissioners requested additional documentation and public input.
City staff opened a public hearing describing the property as zoned R1 and currently occupied by a museum on the main floor and a two‑bedroom apartment upstairs. Staff said the house was donated to the city in 2016 and that a preliminary assessor estimate of market value was between $212,000 and $225,000. Staff also said the city had contacted descendants of the family that donated the house and would allow family members to walk through the home to identify memorabilia they wish to retain.
Commissioners pressed staff on several practical and stewardship concerns. They asked whether any deed covenants or restrictions obligate the city to preserve the house as a museum (staff said none were found in the deed copy provided), how often the museum is open (staff cited limited records and summer Sunday tours historically), whether a historic‑commission organization currently exists to steward the collection, and how the city would handle tenant relocation and ongoing maintenance costs.
One commissioner said the city should not create a situation that puts a long‑term tenant at risk; another said the commission was weighing ethical concerns over selling a donated house that holds community history. A motion to recommend declaring the property surplus with conditions (suitable relocation for the tenant and an established plan for disposition of historically significant furniture and items) was made but later withdrawn to allow time for more information.
Commissioners asked staff to assemble specific items before returning the matter: an official statement from the historic preservation commission (if such a statement exists), an inventory and plan for the museum contents, operating expense and any profit/loss data for the property, a comparative market analysis or documented valuation, and evidence of additional public outreach. A substitute motion to postpone consideration until a future planning commission meeting that allows time for that information passed on a roll call vote.
The commission recorded that staff had notified neighboring property owners at least 15 days before the hearing and that staff had told the tenant the city intended to list the property in the fall but would work with her and could hold the property through spring if needed. The commission directed staff to prepare the requested materials and public‑engagement steps for the next suitable meeting.
The postponement means no formal recommendation to the city commission will be made at this meeting; staff will return with the requested documentation and outreach outcomes before any vote to recommend sale.
