Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Department topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs SAFER grant application to add firefighters as calls approach 2,000 annually
Summary
Big Rapids officials voted to support a FEMA SAFER grant that would add staff to increase daily fire-shift crews from three to four; staff estimate three new firefighters would cost about $296,000 per year (including benefits) and the grant would cover 75% of first two years, 35% of year three, with the city responsible thereafter.
Get email alerts on the Fire Department topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Big Rapids City Commission voted to support applying for a FEMA SAFER (Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response) grant intended to fund added firefighter positions.
Mark (staff member) and Fire Chief Steve Schroeder told commissioners the city has seen a near doubling of annual runs over 12 years — to about 1,983 calls last year — and added workload from the Big Rapids Township agreement has increased staffing needs. Chief Schroeder described the grant structure as a four‑year commitment: the grant would fund 75% of the staffing increase in years one and two; 35% in year three; and the city would fully fund the positions in the fourth year if it chooses to retain them.
Chief Schroeder said the incremental cost for adding three full‑time firefighters, including benefits but excluding overtime, is $296,000 per year. He and staff emphasized the need for a rapid application because the grant announcement window was short; staff committed to prepare a financial plan so the commission can decide whether to accept the award if it is offered.
Commissioners asked about competitiveness and financial sustainability. Mark said the department’s run volume, mutual‑aid relationships with neighboring communities, and the city’s financial position make the application competitive. Commissioners voted to support submitting the application and directed staff to complete a financial analysis outlining options for covering future years’ costs if the grant is awarded.
Because the grant would create a multiyear funding obligation, staff will return with a plan for city funding, cost‑recovery options and potential revenue sources prior to any acceptance of funds.

