Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Grove Residences Privacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident Daniel Palmer asks Fox River Grove to require privacy fencing at Grove Residences site

Village of Fox River Grove President and Board of Trustees · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Nov. 9 Capital Improvement meeting, resident Daniel Palmer told the board that demolition at the Grove Residences removed trees and chain-link fencing that had separated neighbors' backyards from the development and asked the board to require the developer to install a privacy fence and natural screening as part of final plan approval.

Daniel Palmer, a resident of 420 Concord Avenue, asked the Village of Fox River Grove Board of Trustees on Nov. 9 to require a privacy fence and natural landscape screening along the Grove Residences development after demolition removed existing barriers.

Palmer told the board that "privacy barriers (i.e., trees & chain link fence) between their backyards and the new apartments were removed during the demolition phase, allowing visibility into their yards and homes," and he asked the board to include a new privacy fence and plantings as a condition when approving the development's final plans.

President Marc McLaughlin thanked Palmer for coming to the meeting. The minutes record no formal response from the developer nor a motion by the board to require specific screening or fencing at that meeting.

The request was made during the public-comment portion of the Nov. 9 capital improvements meeting, which otherwise focused on the village's 10-year capital improvement plan and several infrastructure and park projects. The record does not show any follow-up direction to staff to require or negotiate a fence with the developer at that time; any such action would require separate staff work or a future agenda item.