Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mono County board designates county-owned sites for housing development to streamline Lee Vining project
Summary
The Mono County Board of Supervisors voted to designate housing as a permitted use on county-owned public and quasi-public parcels — a change aimed at speeding a planned Lee Vining housing project by removing a separate use-permit requirement while preserving public review steps such as mapping and subdivision review.
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Mono County Board of Supervisors on June 9 voted to allow housing development as an outright permitted use on county-owned public and quasi-public parcels, a change county counsel said is intended to streamline internal county housing projects such as the planned Lee Vining site.
Deputy County Counsel Jeff Hughes told the board the resolution would apply only to property owned by Mono County and would "bypass the use permit process" for county-led housing development while leaving the public-mapping and subdivision processes in place. "It just makes it simpler for us in this housing development context to just try and make things go quicker," Hughes said.
County Administrative Officer Moberly said the county has already done extensive public outreach on the Lee Vining project and will continue community engagement as planning proceeds. She told supervisors that community-development review would still apply if the county subdivides the parcel, adding the change "just takes the requirement of the use permit off the project."
Supporters during the board discussion said the measure is narrowly tailored to county-owned land and would not change permitting requirements for private property. "It does nothing except identify housing as a permitted use in public and quasi public facilities zoning where the county owns it only," a supervisor said during debate.
The board adopted the resolution by motion; no substantive amendments were added. The action means staff can move more quickly on the Lee Vining site, but additional approvals and community processes tied to mapping, environmental review and subdivision will still apply.
Next steps: staff will proceed with internal project planning for the Lee Vining site and return to the board with project-level details and statutory timelines as needed.
