Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Responder Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates adopting state language to raise volunteer emergency responder tax abatement to $2,000
Summary
The board discussed adopting state statute wording to increase the local tax-abatement cap for certified volunteer emergency responders from $1,000 to $2,000, debated whether retirees should be eligible, noted a potential first-year escrow of roughly $100,000, and agreed to draft ordinance language for a future packet.
Get email alerts on the Emergency Responder Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Select spent much of its June 16 meeting debating whether to adopt state statute wording that would raise the town's maximum tax abatement for certified volunteer emergency responders from $1,000 to $2,000 and create a revised tiered schedule.
Rich, who identified his long involvement with the fire commission, presented the proposal and provided handouts showing tier options and call-volume data. He said the state-language option would allow a $2,000 maximum and a tiered structure based on years of service and activity levels. He explained the eligibility standard in the proposal ties payment to activity: members must be active and meet a percent-of-call threshold.
Board members pressed on funding and scope. Several participants noted the board of finance had discussed seeding an escrow for the program's start-up and cited a figure of about $100,000 as a possible one-time reserve to smooth first-year payouts. Members also examined call-volume math: the proposal's 5% participation threshold was described as translating to roughly 75 calls for one local department in 2025 based on the figures in the handout.
The central area of disagreement was retirees' eligibility. One member warned that allowing retired volunteers who no longer actively respond to receive the full $2,000 could create a durable long-term liability, citing an off-the-cuff estimate that including retirees might increase annual costs by "another $20,000–$30,000." Others noted the state statute language can permit retired members but that the town can design local tiers to prioritize active participation.
Members also clarified the scope of eligible participants: the statute language discussed covers certified volunteer EMTs, firefighters and fire police and may be written to include volunteers who serve under mutual-aid arrangements with neighboring towns. The board agreed the next step is for staff and board members to draft ordinance language revising chapter 98 and to include the revision in the town's upcoming ordinance packet for formal consideration.
No formal ordinance vote occurred at the meeting; board members instructed staff and counsel to prepare the draft language for a future meeting.

