Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Staffing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plumas County planning director asks to reallocate one FTE into two planner positions; board requests cost analysis and defers final action

Plumas County Board of Supervisors · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The planning director asked to replace one assistant planning director FTE with two flexibly allocated planner FTEs to address a backlog of roughly 55 projects; supervisors asked for a full cost breakdown and directed staff to return with a resolution and recruiting authorization at the June 30 meeting.

Planning Director Tracy Ferguson asked the board to amend FY25–26 position allocations to remove one assistant planning director FTE and add two flexibly allocated planner FTEs. Ferguson said the candidate pool currently yields more applicants at the assistant/associate/senior planner levels and that adding two flexibly allocated planners will improve project throughput across roughly 55 active projects.

Auditor-controller staff requested a detailed long-term cost breakdown (including health insurance and other benefits) and suggested the item be considered in the FY26–27 budget process to ensure sustainable funding. Supervisors debated an interim option — converting one FTE to a flexibly allocated planner now so recruitment can begin pending broader budget decisions — and generally agreed to continue the item to the June 30 special meeting so staff can produce cost data and a recruiting-fill proposal.

Ferguson noted recruitment challenges since December 2021 after the assistant planning director retired and said the department is currently operating with two planners and a part-time senior planner; approval of additional allocated positions would help reduce per-planner caseloads.

Next steps: board directed staff to return on June 30 with a breakdown of total compensation costs and a recruitment plan; they signaled tentative support for creating at least one flexibly allocated position immediately with the second position subject to budget review.