Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Element topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning staff: Housing element submitted to state; missed deadline could affect some grants, but no funds lost yet

Plumas County Planning Commission · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Plumas County staff reported the revised 2024–2029 housing element was submitted to HCD on 05/08/2026; the state has 60 days to respond. Staff warned the county missed the 06/30/2024 deadline and that some state grants may be at risk, but said no funds have been lost to date. Planning staff will engage the HCD reviewer and prepare an implementation matrix.

Planning staff told the commission that Plumas County submitted its revised 2024–2029 housing element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on May 8, 2026, and that HCD has up to 60 days to respond.

Staff acknowledged the county missed the statutory deadline of June 30, 2024, and said that could jeopardize eligibility for some state grant programs tied to a current certified housing element. However, staff said they have not yet been informed of any funding loss and are coordinating with county departments (including behavioral health) and local housing partners to protect ongoing grant opportunities. The planning director said the county is in close contact with HCD reviewers and plans to follow up proactively.

Commissioners asked which specific grants might be affected. Staff identified potential implications for certain state funding rounds administered through regional bodies (including HAP allocations routed through the Northern California continuum of care and the local Plumas Continuum network) and noted that programmatic work on housing strategies and economic development (work funded through a wildfire‑recovery grant) has been completed and will help support required implementation.

Staff also discussed technical reporting questions raised by HCD, including how accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are categorized (HCD’s default reporting assumes ADUs are rental units unless jurisdictions provide supporting documentation). Staff said Tim Evans (planning staff) has responded to HCD on methodology questions and that the department will develop a clearer implementation matrix that lists required programs, responsible parties, and realistic timelines; staff suggested consultants could be retained through the planning commission professional services budget to accelerate ordinance work tied to the housing element.

Next steps: planning staff will engage the HCD reviewer within the 60‑day review window, prepare an implementation matrix for commissioners and the board, and identify consultant support options and budget needs for required ordinance amendments.