Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Disaster Recovery topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plumas supervisors weigh enforcement timeline as Chapter 9 interim rules expire June 30

Plumas County Board of Supervisors · June 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff told the board Chapter 9 emergency rules for debris removal and interim housing will sunset June 30; supervisors directed staff to hold a public meeting in Greenville and return with enforcement-timeline recommendations, including possible extended compliance windows and supportive services for displaced residents.

Plumas County staff told the Board of Supervisors on June 2 that Chapter 9 of Title IV — which created temporary rules for debris and hazard-tree removal as well as emergency interim housing after the Beckwithe Complex and Dixie fires — is scheduled to sunset on June 30 and that certain articles may no longer be necessary while others still merit temporary measures or transition planning.

Planning staff said they identified no continuing need to extend articles on mandatory debris and hazard-tree removal (article 2) or on temporary staging yards and processing sites (article 4), but raised concerns about article 1 (findings) and articles 5–6 addressing emergency interim housing. Staff explained that after the sunset, the county will enforce the usual land-use code (Title IX) that generally restricts year-round RV occupancy outside licensed parks and that some displaced residents who remain in temporary dwellings may be affected.

Staff described options including case-by-case code-enforcement notices with compliance periods (for example, a 60-day window under a notice of violation if the board so chooses) and a soft-enforcement approach while supportive services and housing resources are offered. Planning staff said it is difficult to estimate how many residents might be affected without parcel-by-parcel investigations but noted some community estimates of a dozen to a couple dozen in Greenville alone. The board scheduled a public information meeting for June 3 at 6 p.m. in Greenville to gather feedback and asked staff to return with a staff recommendation for a future meeting (possible agenda item June 16).

Supervisors emphasized balancing enforcement with compassion for fire survivors and the county's housing limitations. Staff and supervisors identified partners (disaster case managers, community development commission, social services, behavioral health, and PRC resources) for referrals and potential temporary housing solutions. No immediate county-wide change to the code was adopted; the board sought public input and additional staff analysis before setting an enforcement policy.