Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts Mid Pines Community Plan but holds off on two parcel land‑use changes pending environmental review
Summary
The board adopted the Mid Pines Community Plan into the general plan but removed a planning commission recommendation to change the land‑use classification for two parcels (including the 'Octagon' site), citing the need for additional CEQA review and a vehicle‑miles‑traveled analysis before any density changes.
The Mariposa County Board of Supervisors on April 21 adopted the Mid Pines Community Plan as a policy addition to the county general plan, but the board excluded a planning commission recommendation to change the land‑use classification for two northern parcels until staff can complete additional environmental review.
Planning staff said the community plan — developed over many years by a Mid Pines Planning Advisory Committee — is a “mini‑general plan” intended to preserve rural character, promote fire safety and set local land‑use guidance for small‑scale commercial, residential and work‑force housing. The plan contains new classifications including a ‘‘planned development area’’ and updated rural economic and residential categories.
At the Planning Commission’s March hearing, commissioners recommended a series of textual edits and policy clarifications. The commission also recommended changing the land‑use classification for two parcels along Highway 140 — one of roughly 158 acres known locally as the Octagon site and an adjacent 24‑acre parcel — from Natural Resources to Residential. Planning staff warned the board that this change represents an increase in potential density that was not analyzed in the initial study; recirculation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including a vehicle‑miles‑traveled (VMT) analysis, would be required.
Members of the Mid Pines Advisory Committee, who had previously reviewed the plan, urged retaining the existing Natural Resources designation for those parcels because of steep topography, limited developable area and a history of fearful reaction to wildfire. The committee said owners seeking higher density could pursue a separate land‑use change or discretionary permit with a specific environmental review.
The board voted to adopt the negative CEQA declaration and incorporate the Mid Pines Community Plan into Volume II of the general plan, while removing the two parcel land‑use changes from the adoption motion so staff could assess and, if necessary, perform additional environmental analysis for those proposed changes.
What’s next: Staff said that if the board wants to pursue the land‑use reclassification for those parcels, the county would need to recirculate environmental materials, perform a VMT analysis and follow the general plan amendment process; alternatively, property owners may seek discretionary permits or a standalone general‑plan amendment for their parcels.
