Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinances topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sabattus Planning Board discusses potential disorderly-house, blasting-notification, ADU and other ordinance changes
Summary
Board members discussed drafting ordinances on disorderly houses and blasting notifications, reviewing site-plan and massage-therapist language, and updating ADU/septic rules to comply with state LDs; members requested staff research and attorney input and did not adopt any ordinances at the meeting.
Members of the Sabattus Planning Board discussed a set of potential ordinance topics for next year, requested staff follow-up, and agreed not to adopt any new ordinances at the meeting.
An email-initiated suggestion for a "disorderly house" ordinance prompted discussion about whether repeated emergency or police calls to a residence should create owner responsibility for fees or penalties. Members said the idea overlaps with domestic and nuisance standards and asked staff to research legal and enforcement implications.
The board revisited an earlier suggestion for a local blasting ordinance. Members noted state regulations likely already govern blasting practices but discussed whether a local requirement for advance notification (for example, posting on the town website or other media) would provide useful public protection. Several attendees said proving foundation damage from blasting can be legally and practically difficult.
Members asked staff (Aaron was identified as the person who will review site-plan material) to examine proposed site-plan language and to check whether the massage-therapist ordinance language needs revision to match state statute. The board asked the town attorney to review statutory overlaps before republication.
On housing and land-use topics, members discussed accessory dwelling units (ADUs), septic and sewer capacity tied to bedroom counts, and the permissibility of two full residences on one lot. Board members said the town will need to update ordinances to reflect state legislative changes mentioned in the meeting (LD 2003 and LD 189 were cited) and flagged a future population threshold (LD 2827 referenced) that could trigger additional compliance obligations.
Members also briefly discussed whether impact fees or a tax-increment (TIF) approach could provide revenue for capital needs; they noted Sabattus does not currently have an economic-development office and said more research is required.
The board directed staff to research the suggested ordinances, consult the town attorney on statutory conflicts, and return with drafts and recommendations. No formal motions to adopt ordinances were made.
