Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Fencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
ZBA questions need for 8‑foot fence variance and asks applicant for more information
Summary
Members of the Woodstock ZBA expressed skepticism about an 8‑foot fence variance in case 2609, citing inconsistent application materials and doubts that an 8‑foot height is necessary; the board asked the applicant’s representative (Mr. Wallace) to supply clarifying information and materials before taking further action.
The Woodstock Zoning Board of Appeals on June 11 discussed ZBA case 2609, an application seeking approval for an 8‑foot fence. Several members said the application materials were incomplete or inconsistent with prior referrals, and questioned whether an 8‑foot height was justified. One board member said they had "a hard time accepting the idea of an 8oot fence without a really really good reason."
Board members noted discrepancies between the written variance request and the materials provided (questions over fence length, materials and whether it enclosed a residence). The board asked its staff to contact the applicant’s representative, identified in the record as Mr. Wallace, requesting contact information, fence length and material details before scheduling further review. Members signaled they were unlikely to favor an 8‑foot fence absent clear justification that meets the standards for a variance.
Next steps: ZBA staff will attempt to obtain missing materials from the applicant; the board may inspect the site or schedule a special meeting to decide once full information is received.
