Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council narrows some lot‑width requirements and OKs Main Street sign changes, with variable‑message rules set aside
Summary
The Gunnison City Council amended land‑use code to reduce minimum lot‑widths in selected zones to encourage infill and approved Main Street signage changes while removing the variable‑message/time‑change restriction for further review.
Gunnison’s City Council on June 17 approved two land‑use code changes: a Main Street signage amendment that extends sidewalk encroachment allowances to more of Main Street (with the council excluding a proposed time/variable‑message restriction) and a revision to minimum lot‑width measurements intended to enable infill development in older parts of town.
Dennis explained the Main Street sign ordinance would make the same sign‑encroachment allowance that currently exists in the historic overlay applicable citywide along Main Street, align local rules with UDOT timing and static‑message standards for variable‑message signs, and clarify how electronic signage is treated. Several councilmembers expressed concern that strict timing or static requirements could disable existing local business marquees (including the city sign and dealership signs). The council voted to approve the ordinance while excluding the sub‑section on variable‑message timing (sub 3) so that staff can consult businesses and refine the language.
On lot widths, the planning commission recommended clarifying how frontage and lot width are measured (measured along the right‑of‑way/front setback) and reducing minimum widths in certain zones to encourage infill while maintaining existing area requirements. Under the adopted change, single‑family minimum lot width in the R‑2 zone would be reduced from 100 feet to 70 feet, and corporate zone width requirements would drop from 120 feet to 90 feet while keeping area requirements the same. Dennis said many existing lots in older neighborhoods already have narrower widths and the change would allow those legally created lots to move forward with development rather than being blocked by a stricter width standard.
Council discussion touched on grandfathering, the process for splitting lots, and the limited number of larger parcels that could be subdivided under the new rules. After debate, the council adopted the minimum lot‑width amendment to the land‑use code.
Both ordinances return the city code to match practice in some parts of town (signage encroachments) and to clarify technical measurement language for lot frontage and width; staff will notify affected property owners and businesses and incorporate any required design standards into implementation guidance.
