Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves preliminary plat for Rock Creek development but rejects Seventh Street extension
Summary
After hours of public comment and debate about safety, easements and costs, the Maxwell City Council approved the developer's original preliminary plat for the Rock Creek area but declined the planning-and-zoning recommendation to extend Seventh Street through an established neighborhood.
The Maxwell City Council approved the original preliminary plat for the Rock Creek development while rejecting a planning-and-zoning recommendation to extend Seventh Street into the new subdivision.
The decision followed a multi-hour public discussion in which developers presented a preliminary cost opinion and residents raised objections about driveway impacts, easements and potential flooding. Brent C., representing Snider and Associates, told the council the firm's early cost opinion called for pavement removal, a vertical curve and possible storm-sewer improvements; he said estimates were preliminary because surveys of the existing right-of-way were limited.
Residents and commissioners pressed for safety and access analysis. "When my son was in second grade, the school district told us not to have the bus drop him off at that intersection because of safety concerns," said Shelley Balky, who identified herself as a member of the planning and zoning commission and a Rock Creek Drive resident. Other residents objected to the prospect of losing several feet of their backyards or driveways for easements and sidewalks.
Council members split over priorities. Several members referenced a DOT traffic study from 2018 that indicated the intersection could support additional homes but said that does not resolve neighborhood livability concerns. One council supporter of a second access argued it would improve emergency response times and reduce congestion on Rock Creek Drive; opponents said a new connection could add $250,000'$350,000 in costs and might force developers to seek larger incentives or to abandon the project.
After an initial vote defeated the motion adopting the planning-and-zoning recommendation, a motion to reconsider was moved and carried. On reconsideration, the council rejected the extension and approved the developer's original preliminary plat, with the understanding the developer and city would continue to work on alternative access and incentive questions. Mayor Higgins and four council members recorded the final roll call when the motion carried.
The council and developer also discussed related timing: the city needs to finalize certain items so the developer can apply for state workforce-housing tax credits. Staff and the developer tentatively scheduled a finance-committee review and a special meeting to finalize any letters of support ahead of the application deadline.
Next steps: the developer will refine cost and easement options and return to the council; staff will coordinate the finance committee to review incentive options and any city commitments.
