Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Township workshops draft right-of-way ordinance focused on obstructive parking, mailboxes and fines
Summary
At a June 17 workshop, Barrett Township supervisors reviewed a draft ordinance aimed at preventing long-term obstructions in township rights of way, debated mailbox setbacks, time-to-comply rules and suggested a graduated fine structure instead of steep criminal penalties.
Barrett Township supervisors reviewed a draft right-of-way ordinance at a June 17 workshop that would give the township clearer authority to remove or require removal of long-term obstructions — from trailers and fences to overgrown grass — on township-maintained roads.
Chairman Hilfiger opened the meeting by reminding attendees the workshop was for discussion and information only and that “no formal action will be taken,” and then led a detailed review of proposed code language. The draft code cites a presumed 25-foot right-of-way measured from the road centerline and includes provisions aimed at habitual obstructions rather than short-term parking for events.
Residents raised practical concerns about the 25-foot assumption and mailbox placement. Patty, a resident who checked her deed, said her property line begins “25 ft from the center line,” and asked whether mailboxes that sit closer to the road would be affected; board members suggested the ordinance should account for “exceptional circumstances” such as delivery access.
The group discussed enforcement mechanics in the draft. The draft text described written notice procedures (delivery and mailed copy), post-tow notice requirements and differing time-to-comply windows: five days for vehicles and 30 days for structures. Board members emphasized the ordinance should prioritize voluntary compliance and graduated penalties instead of automatic criminal sanctions; attendees criticized example penalties in the draft such as a $1,000 fine or 90 days in jail as disproportionate for many residents.
Supervisors suggested changes including removing mailbox-specific language from the initial definition section, adding grass/vegetation to the list of prohibited encroachments and creating a tiered fine structure (for example lower fines for first offenses and escalating penalties for repeat violations). They also discussed language to allow immediate action in emergencies when obstruction threatens snow removal, fire or ambulance access.
The board did not take a vote. Members agreed to continue refining the draft, consider a graduated penalty schedule and present a revised ordinance or possible referral to the planning commission at a later meeting.
