Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board presses applicant on truck movements and pedestrian safety near Lawrence Street project
Summary
During the work session board members and planning staff pressed a warehouse applicant on truck turning radii, proposed widening and an unusual plan to 'break the cap' on contaminated soils; the Supervisor urged the town to pursue a state- or federally funded pedestrian bridge near Sawmill River Parkway.
Town and planning officials used the work session to identify unresolved engineering and traffic issues for a warehouse application near Lawrence Street and Sawmill River Parkway, including truck turning radius, traffic patterns on Sawmill River Parkway and pedestrian safety at a bus stop that the record says the current roundabout cannot accommodate.
Planning-board materials include a recommendation memo with 23 items for the Town Board to review; staff said they compiled recent consultant and engineering comments and asked the applicant to respond point-by-point in writing so responses can be part of the official record. The planning representative recommended the board ask the applicant directly whether they had surveyed the site to determine if two lanes could be widened; staff noted an April 30 applicant response exists but said some plan sheets were difficult to open online.
The Supervisor urged a more ambitious approach: citing nearby development proposals, she asked the board to press state and federal legislators for funding for a pedestrian bridge over Sawmill River Parkway, saying it would improve safety and benefit the shopping center and local economy. "If we got that pedestrian bridge, it's gonna save lives," the Supervisor said.
Technical concerns also included an unusual remediation plan: the applicant proposed removing soil from under an existing cap and bringing in fill, which town engineering described as atypical and requiring clearer explanation of remediation and resealing procedures. Planning and engineering recommended the applicant provide a survey and explicit remediation plan and to present any new plan sheets when appearing before the board.
Why it matters: the discussion covers land-use, public-safety and environmental remediation issues that could affect local traffic, pedestrian access and contamination controls. Board members asked for engineering input, written applicant responses and an applicant presentation at a work session before the public hearing scheduled July 22.
What’s next: staff will follow up with the applicant to request the missing plan sheets, engineering will review turning-radius and stormwater comments, and the board expects written responses to the 23 planning recommendations to be posted in advance of further hearings.
