Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pay To Participate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public pushes back on Elyria City Schools' proposed pay-to-participate policy
Summary
Residents, students and coaches urged the Elyria City School Board on June 10 to reject a proposed pay-to-participate policy, saying fees would bar low-income students from athletics, arts and other activities; the board took no action at the meeting.
Residents, students and coaches packed the June 10 Elyria City School Board meeting to oppose a proposed pay-to-participate policy that would charge families to participate in some extracurricular activities.
"If pay to participate, you will be making families sacrifice even more from their kitchen tables," said Gel Rivera, an educator and parent, citing what she said were funding losses to charter schools and voucher programs that have strained the district. Rivera said orchestra students and others could lose scholarship opportunities if they cannot continue in high school programs.
Sean Beckwith, a resident and 2015 alumnus, told the board Elyria’s economic indicators and recent state funding cuts make extra charges infeasible. "There simply is no more room," Beckwith said, citing local inflation and a roughly 16% poverty rate in Elyria. He urged the community to pursue grants, subsidies and corporate sponsorships rather than fees.
Resident Jessica Ghart offered comparative income data for neighboring districts and said that of Ohio’s 611 districts, 221 have pay-to-play policies — and that districts typically provide free or reduced fees for students on free/reduced-price meals. "Implementing these fees in Elyria will unfairly limit opportunities for our students," she said.
Student speaker Serena, who participates in track, cross country and wrestling, said fees would pressure students and could force many teammates off teams. "If I had to pay, that would be a lot of money spent on a sport. I would be pressured every day… and I would eventually lose my spark," she said.
Longtime coach Jackie Below described diminished participation after past service reductions and warned that fees could further shrink rosters and hurt college recruiting for multi-sport athletes.
The board opened a special, 30-minute public-comment period limited to questions and comments about the pay-to-participate policy and said each speaker could have up to five minutes under a modified BDDH procedure. After hearing public testimony the board president said it would take no formal action on the policy that night while continuing to gather community input.
Why it matters: Board discussion comes after a recent levy failure and a treasurer’s report showing county tax-credit changes that reduced district receipts. Speakers said fees would disproportionately affect lower-income families and could reduce students’ access to college-recruiting opportunities, arts and athletics.
What’s next: The board did not vote on the policy at the June 10 meeting; members said they would continue to collect public feedback and consider further steps at a future meeting.
