Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates trail grant scope, town consent and proposed local match
Summary
Commission members said they will draft a GRAMA trails grant and proposed a $25,000 local match (described as 10% of a $250,000 project). Members urged earlier drafting to meet a June application deadline and discussed the need for town-manager consent for contractor solicitation.
Members of the Old Orchard Beach Conservation Commission spent substantial time on March 9 discussing a planned trails grant application and how the town should organize subcommittee and procurement steps.
Committee member (speaker 2), who has led the trails effort, said he and Kim Barker have drafted a scope for a consolidated trails project that would bundle smaller trail improvements into one grant application. He said the grant could cover projects including the Ahearn and Milliken Mills trail improvements, water access on the Little River and Mill Pond access points, and standardized signage to brand town trails.
Speaker 2 said securing town-manager consent is necessary before soliciting engineering RFPs and emphasized the need to involve Public Works and council members because a large grant would require local match and broader community awareness. "I put it in the budget...just put 25,000. Just saying it's 10% of the 2 50," he said, describing the local-match strategy.
Commission members flagged procedural uncertainty about whether subcommittee meetings must be televised and when a subcommittee becomes subject to televised/public-meeting rules. Multiple members noted Memorial Park’s past handling of subcommittees as precedent for less-formal working meetings, while the town manager’s office had said some subcommittee meetings must be held in the chamber and televised.
Timing was a recurring concern. The committee cited an application deadline in mid-to-late June (speaker 2 said June 20), and members urged drafting the submission well before the deadline rather than leaving it to the final week.
Budget details surfaced in conversation. Speaker 2 provided a line-item update indicating the commission’s professional-engineering services account had activity beyond its prior request: the transcript reports $10,809.18 of professional-engineering charges against a $9,000 allocation, leaving an apparent overrun of $1,809.18. Members discussed which departmental line (grounds and maintenance vs DPW vs professional services) should carry items such as parking-lot work, composting startup costs, and beetle purchases.
Next steps included circulating the online grant application link, confirming whether public meetings are required by the grant, assembling a draft before the June deadline, and clarifying procurement steps with the town manager and Public Works.
