Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic district approves several solar installations but requires redesigns and black roof/pattern conditions for front-facing arrays
Summary
The commission approved multiple solar projects but repeatedly required black panels on a dark roof and a uniform rectangular layout for panels on front-facing roofs; one project was continued for redesign and re-advertising to meet scenic-road and visibility rules.
Get email alerts on the Solar Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners signaled broad support for rooftop solar but enforced strict design standards for panels visible from public ways in the historic district, approving some applications while continuing others for redesign.
At the meeting, contractors and homeowners presented several solar proposals. The board reiterated its three-tier framework: panels on more visible, sensitive properties must be black-on-black or placed on a dark roof; front-facing installations must form a uniform rectangular or square array; and installations visible from designated scenic roads face the toughest review standards.
Cooper Postmore of Freedom Forever and other contractors discussed possible reconfigurations to meet those criteria. For one project on Doctor Stanton Road, commissioners said rotating two panels and redrawing the middle array could produce an acceptable square or rectangular layout. The board offered two paths: a continuance allowing the applicant time to re-advertise and redraw plans, or a conditional approval (an administrative amendment) that would allow work to proceed on portions that already meet the rules while the applicant returns with a revised layout for remaining panels.
Where the board approved arrays, it typically added a condition that roof color be changed to a darker shade or that the applicant submit a follow-up amendment showing the uniform array. One application was continued to the Sept. 24 meeting because the redesign required re-advertising to meet the commission’s deadlines.
The board said it wants to facilitate solar adoption where possible but will require installations to meet the district’s visual standards when panels are visible from roads or scenic ways.
