Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council OKs code cleanup but sends ADU visibility rule back to staff after concerns
Summary
Council approved Ordinance 2026‑03 with multiple code clarifications (signs, roof pitch, PC zone language) but unanimously voted to strike and return the ADU‑entrance visibility provision for further staff work after members raised concerns about older homes, screening, and enforcement.
The South Jordan City Council approved a package of municipal code clarifications on Feb. 3 but removed one contested ADU provision for further work.
Long‑range planner Joe Moss presented Ordinance 2026‑03, a multi‑part code amendment that clarifies how monument sign height is measured (measured from sidewalk with illustrations), sets guidance for pitched roofs in the CN zone (75% pitched with up to 10% dormer allowance), removes outdated PC zone references, and clarifies language about accessory dwelling unit (ADU) entrances. "We just wanted that to be clear that we we're okay in those situations," Moss said while explaining the ADU entrance intent.
The ADU provision (17.13.0.030) proved controversial. Several council members argued the proposed wording could inadvertently bar homeowners in existing neighborhoods from creating basement ADUs or penalize homeowners whose side entrances are visible despite reasonable efforts to screen them. Council member Zander said the change could prevent residents from obtaining needed rental income and proposed more flexibility: "I would move to strike the 17.13.0.303 and ask staff to go back and relook at this and bring it back to us," Zander said, asking staff to return with alternative language that might allow screening, fences, or case‑by‑case review.
Council discussion examined enforcement questions (whether a fully fenced or screened entrance should be allowed), Daybreak master‑plan exceptions, parking and safety concerns on corner lots, and distinctions between new construction and existing homes. Staff explained the current code prohibits entrances visible from the street but that interpretation and administration have sometimes relied on screening or fencing as a defense; council members urged staff to develop more flexible language that accounts for existing conditions.
After the debate, Zander moved to approve Ordinance 2026‑03 while striking section 17.13.0.303 and asking staff to propose revised language; the motion was seconded and the council approved the ordinance as amended by unanimous roll call.
Why it matters: The decision preserves most proposed code clarifications while ensuring staff will return with a refined approach on ADU entrances so homeowners—particularly those in older neighborhoods—aren’t inadvertently prevented from creating accessory units. That matters for housing options and for residents who may rely on rental income.
What’s next: Staff will revisit ADU‑visibility language and return to the council with alternative language that clarifies allowed entrances, screening standards, and applicability to new versus existing homes. The ordinance as amended takes effect per normal adoption procedures.
