Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates Oakland County school millage and rejects resolution opposing the August measure
Summary
Council heard extended debate over whether the city should oppose a proposed 1.5‑mill Oakland County regional school millage; after legal guidance about restrictions on public advocacy, the council voted 4–1 against adopting a resolution opposing the millage (Mayor Caner the lone yes).
Get email alerts on the School Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lathrup Village City Council declined on June 15 to adopt a resolution opposing a proposed Oakland County regional school millage that would add 1.5 mills to property tax bills and direct funding to county schools.
Council members debated for more than an hour about whether it is appropriate for a municipal government to take an official position on a ballot proposal that affects resident taxes. Supporters of the resolution argued Lathrup Village is a donor district that would contribute more than it receives from the millage; opponents said the city should not be in the business of opposing or endorsing ballot measures and raised concerns about setting a precedent and possible backlash.
City legal counsel referenced state law limiting public bodies' use of funds to advocate for or against ballot proposals, noting officials may distribute factual information but public expenditure for advocacy is restricted. "Public Act 269 ... limits a public body's ability to support or expend funds to advocate for or against a candidate or a ballot proposal," counsel explained, adding that individual council members may express personal views.
After discussion, the council held a roll call vote. Mayor Bruce Caner voted yes; Council members Hammond, Susanis, Jennings and Mayor Pro Tem Garrett voted no. The resolution failed.
Council members also discussed alternatives to a formal resolution, including non‑advocacy public education and coordination with neighboring jurisdictions on outreach. Several members urged more communication between school boards and municipalities about proposed school funding measures.

