Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Caseyville board schedules vote on new trash contract; approves multiple routine items and bills

Village of Caseyville Board of Trustees ยท June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees were informed a proposed trash contract with a residential rate of $51.00 quarterly (optional recycling $24.00; senior rate $43.35) will be voted at the next meeting; the board also approved minutes, a business transfer (Resolution 262) and bills totalling $256,255 (amounts in transcript include unclear items).

At the June 17 meeting, board members were told the village will vote at its next meeting on a new residential trash contract that the transcript records with proposed rates of $51.00 quarterly for standard residential service, an optional recycling charge of $24.00, and a senior rate of $43.35 quarterly. Staff said they would circulate an email with contract details prior to the vote.

On the consent and new business portions of the agenda the board approved routine items: a motion to approve recording minutes and committee minutes from June 3; approval of planning/zoning items; and approval of a business ownership/background-check matter (identified in the transcript as Resolution 262 related to a fried-chicken business at a street number given). Trustees recorded 'yes' votes on these motions in the meeting record.

The board approved the bills as read by the clerk. The clerk recited multiple line items across funds (the transcript includes General Fund $25,617; Fire protection $4,877.56; Community building $1,63.34; Parks $1,940; cemetery $787; and other lines) and reported a total of $256,255. Some line-item figures in the transcript appear garbled; the meeting record should be checked against the clerks' written voucher for exact amounts.

No contentious debate is recorded on these items in the transcript. Where exact figures or full names were not provided in the oral record, this article uses the values and names as spoken and notes where the transcript is unclear.