Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Beaver Creek board approves Revision No. 1 of FY26 budget after split vote

Beaver Creek School District No. 26 · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Sept. 9, 2025, Beaver Creek School District No. 26 approved Revision No. 1 of its FY26 budget after a 4–1 roll-call vote. The revision adjusts ADM downward but increases budget capacity; board discussion focused on a $88,587 M/O increase, a 14.6% rise in purchased services and state school-safety funding.

The Beaver Creek School District No. 26 governing board voted 4–1 on Sept. 9 to adopt Revision No. 1 of the district's fiscal year 2026 budget, a move that adjusts average daily membership (ADM) downward but increases the district’s budget capacity under the new funding formula.

Finance staff reviewed packet slides showing the ADM reduction and line-item changes. Ori Womack, who presented the budget slides, said the district adjusted ADM and “cushioned” certain accounts to cover anticipated changes in provider contracts. Board members highlighted specific figures: a reported $88,587 overall increase in Maintenance & Operation (M/O) and a cited 14.6% increase in purchased services tied to a change in occupational therapy providers.

Board members also discussed an 85.9% increase in a state school-safety line labeled as School Safety Grant funding. Mrs. Wheeler said the district still has not secured a School Resource Officer (SRO) and currently uses off-duty officer services through an Off Duty Management security program; staff said the exact origin of some state allocations was “not specified” in materials.

Carlos Ramos moved to approve the revision; Susi Edgington seconded. President Lincoln Thomasson conducted a roll call. Votes were recorded as Lincoln Thomasson — Aye; Susi Edgington — Aye; Carlos Ramos — Aye; Dr. Richard Hector Sr. — Aye; Renee Dial — Nay. The motion passed 4–1. Board members noted the district could bring a further revision in December if needed.

Why it matters: the changes preserve spending capacity despite declining enrollment and reposition funding for special education and school-safety programming. Next steps: administration may propose additional adjustments later in the fiscal year if expenditures or enrollment deviate from projections.