Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors ask planning board to watch five‑acre parcel at end of Orchard Street; board says no application filed
Summary
Longtime Orchard Street residents urged the Bridgewater Planning Board to note activity at a five‑acre parcel tied to 619 Foothill Road (block 536, lot 12), warning that development could extend the cul‑de‑sac. Board members and staff said no application has been filed and explained permitting and notice procedures.
Longtime residents pressed the Bridgewater Township Planning Board on June 16 about a five‑acre wooded parcel connected to a home at 619 Foothill Road (block 536, lot 12), saying vehicles had been observed entering the end of Orchard Street and expressing fear the site could be redeveloped and the cul‑de‑sac extended.
"The reason we are here for this meeting tonight is concerns over the parcel of property located at the end of Orchard Street, the end of the cul‑de‑sac, which is part of a recently listed house sale located at 619 Foothill Road, block 536, lot 12," resident Laurie LaPierre told the board. LaPierre said she and her husband have lived on Orchard Street for decades and worried about cut‑through traffic, stormwater impacts, and property devaluation if the parcel were developed.
Board members and the board attorney responded that the planning board had received no application related to that parcel. "There have been no applications made to either board," a member said during the public comment exchange. Board counsel and staff reiterated that any proposal to extend a road or subdivide land would normally appear as part of a formal site‑plan or subdivision application and would be reviewed against the township zoning ordinance.
Officials explained how the review process typically unfolds: a prospective buyer or owner conducts due diligence and may consult the township's concept‑review committee (staff planners and engineers) before filing; the board will only consider concrete proposals once an application is filed. The board emphasized that, absent an application, it has no authority to approve a road extension or make binding decisions about the parcel.
Staff also described notification and review rights for neighbors. Property owners within 200 feet of the subject parcel receive personal notice by law, and all application materials must be available for public review at least 10 days before a scheduled hearing under the municipal land use law. Residents were told they may inspect plans at the municipal building, contact planning staff for status updates, and, if they wish, hire professionals to present testimony or cross‑examine applicant witnesses during a public hearing.
LaPierre said she filed an OPRA request (no. 26‑1495) seeking records about the parcel and had not yet received a response; staff said the municipal office had met with an interested party at the counter and offered contact information for follow‑up. Board members repeatedly encouraged neighbors to sign up for agenda email notifications and to attend hearings if and when an application is submitted.
The board did not take any action on the parcel at the meeting. The most recent procedural step remains the residents' filings and monitoring of sales listings; if an application is filed, the municipality will notify nearby property owners per statutory requirements and the matter will return to the appropriate board for public hearing.
