Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Saratoga Springs council enacts revised charter changes after trimming contested items
Summary
After extended public comment about transparency, assessments and representation, the council removed several contested provisions from proposed Local Law No. 4 and voted to enact a set of clarified charter revisions — including placing a civilian review board in the charter — in a series of motions that passed mostly by 4-0 votes.
Mayor Safford and councilors voted Thursday to enact a substantially revised version of proposed Local Law No. 4, a section-by-section update to the Saratoga Springs city charter, after hearing hours of public comment that ranged from concerns about assessment appeals to fears the city might lose representation on the county board of supervisors.
The council first moved to remove a set of specific proposed changes (including certain officer eligibility and attendance provisions, internal-audit language and several other sections) that had drawn public opposition; that motion was seconded and recorded as passing with the clerk’s announced result of “passes 3 0 1.” Mayor Safford then brought multiple follow-up motions to enact clarified language and housekeeping revisions; the council approved those motions by voice vote, with later enactment votes recorded as passing 4-0.
The Charter Review Commission’s chair told the council the edits aim to clean up conflicting language and clarify duties rather than ‘‘gut’’ oversight. Commission members said they rewrote an internal-audit clause to remove a contradictory ‘‘shall…as deemed necessary’’ formulation and replaced it with language allowing the Commissioner of Finance to conduct internal audits as deemed necessary or at the council’s request, with an independent auditor handling audits involving the finance office to avoid conflicts of interest.
Multiple public commenters urged either a full referendum or greater notice. Otis Maxwell described a recent assessment appeal and warned changes affecting the Board of Assessment Review could reduce appeal rights for some property owners; several speakers, including former supervisors, cautioned that changing the charter’s phrasing on county supervisors could jeopardize Saratoga Springs’ current level of representation at the county level if the county later reapportions seats.
Council discussion referenced New York State municipal home rule law and prior attorney-general and comptroller opinions about whether a local body may amend a local law on passage; city counsel read two formal opinions into the record and advised that non-substantial amendments on passage are generally permissible. The mayor said several provisions were removed explicitly because they might require a referendum or run afoul of permissive/mandatory referendum rules.
The final package the council enacted includes numerous housekeeping and procedural updates across titles that the council said will improve clarity around council rules, contract language and departmental responsibilities; one notable substantive change is codifying a Civilian Review Board in the charter as an oversight body. Commissioners emphasized the board will function primarily as oversight and mediation — not as an independent investigatory body with unrestricted subpoena power — and that the council is keeping certain items off the table tonight for further review.
The council moved on to other business after the votes. The Charter Review Commission and council members repeatedly urged residents to read the commission’s posted materials and minutes and to continue engaging as the commission prepares any measures that would go to referendum.
The council’s next steps: implementation language will be finalized in ordinance text where needed; the Charter Review Commission will continue work on any items that might be placed on a ballot for voter consideration.
