Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select board considers ADA compliance committee charter, nominations and scope
Summary
A proposed ADA compliance committee was presented to evaluate town facilities and develop a transition plan under ADA Title II; members debated scope, workload and prioritization, nominated volunteers and discussed voting on the charter; the transcript records nominations and discussion but does not include a final vote tally in the provided segments.
Get email alerts on the Accessibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the select board meeting a member proposed a charter for a new ADA compliance committee to ensure town facilities, programs and services comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title II) and related state laws.
The proponent summarized duties: conduct a self-evaluation, develop a transition plan, advise on policies and implementation, promote accessible communications, seek grant funding, and report to the select board. The membership was proposed at five to seven community volunteers and the presenter said meetings would begin frequently (initially biweekly) before settling to at least quarterly.
Board members raised concerns about the committee’s broad scope and the staff time required. One member urged the group to triage high-priority items (for example, critical building access and immediate safety issues) and to identify which tasks require technical expertise such as structural engineering.
Several volunteers were nominated for membership during the meeting: Sherry Wel, Christopher Root, Maggie Stokes, Jane Rogers, Dave Sanders, Dick Watson and Dan Shay (with the mover offering to serve ex officio). The board discussed bundling the charter and nominations into a single vote. The meeting record shows a motion and a second and extensive discussion; the provided transcript segments do not include a conclusive vote tally or an explicit announcement of final approval.
Next steps identified in discussion included convening the committee, prioritizing an initial set of tasks, reporting back to the board with suggested interim and long-term steps, and clarifying technical support needs.

