Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brockton finance committee backs home-rule changes to recount rules and candidate signature thresholds
Summary
The Finance Committee voted to recommend a home-rule petition that bars recount requests unless the margin is within 1/2 of 1% and that sets nominating signature requirements at 50 for ward and school committee, 100 for at-large, and 150 for mayor; the action now goes to the full City Council.
The Brockton City Council Finance Committee on Monday recommended a home-rule petition that would limit recounts and set new thresholds for nominating petitions. Councilor Michael Thompson (sponsor) said the change responds to last year’s costly recounts and will give the city guardrails on when recounts may be requested.
Fred McDermott, the Elections Commission designee, told the committee that the proposed recount threshold — prohibiting recount petitions unless the margin between first and second place is within one-half of one percent — mirrors state practice and would have prevented recent citywide recounts that he said cost more than $100,000. “If it was in place last year, I think it would have saved the city at least half of that $100,000 on the recounts,” McDermott said.
The petition also originally proposed raising the number of registered-voter signatures required to qualify for the ballot. That part of the draft prompted a sharp debate: Councilor Farwell and Councilor Green warned that raising signature requirements would discourage challengers and appear self-protective. “We should be inviting people to run,” Farwell said, opposing an increase from 50 signatures.
After discussion, the committee considered motions to amend the signature counts. A motion to strike the signature-change provision was withdrawn in favor of an amendment that preserved 50 signatures for ward councilor (and for school committee) while setting at-large candidates at 100 and mayoral candidates at 150. The amendment passed by hand vote. The committee then voted to recommend the home-rule petition to the full City Council as amended.
Why it matters: The change narrows when recounts are allowed, reducing the fiscal and staff burden of full recounts, while the committee’s compromise on signature counts attempts to balance ballot access with candidate seriousness. The matter will be reviewed by the full City Council before any change becomes law.
What happened next: The committee’s recommendation sends the amended home-rule petition to the full City Council for further consideration; no final municipal law changes take effect until approved by the council and the Great and General Court as applicable.
