Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ocean Shores planners table proposed retail-parking changes pending code cleanup
Summary
Commissioners tabled a proposal to remove floor-area-based retail parking requirements after staff and commissioners discovered draft references to outdated code and potential cross-section conflicts that could increase minimum parking for small retail spaces.
OCEAN SHORES, Wash. — At the June 9 Planning Commission meeting commissioners agreed to table further action on proposed changes to Ocean Shores Municipal Code chapters 17.34 and 17.54 governing parking after staff identified conflicting references to outdated code and commissioners raised substantive concerns about unintended effects.
The item under old business would have removed a floor-area-to-parking ratio for retail uses in the B1 zone and established simplified standards. During discussion staff and commissioners found the draft referenced older municipal-code language (including a 1974 code and a 2008 revision) and an online code table showing different retail thresholds (250 or 500 square feet depending on retail type). Commissioners directed staff to consult the current municipal code hosted by the Code Publishing service to ensure proposed edits do not introduce contradictions.
Members also flagged a drafting problem: one paragraph in the draft would have imposed a flat minimum of six off-street parking spaces per establishment in some cases—substantially increasing parking obligations for small retail spaces compared with the existing floor-area formula. Commissioners requested clearer definitions of 'retail establishment' and cross-references so the change would not inadvertently triple parking requirements for typical small storefronts.
Given those open questions, the commission agreed to table the discussion and asked staff to return with revisions based on the current municipal code for consideration at a future meeting. The item will be revisited at a subsequent Planning Commission meeting once staff completes the cross-reference review.
