Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents confront Matawan council over alleged private political messaging and campaign finance disparities
Summary
At the June 16 meeting residents accused council members of private political messaging and described uneven campaign finances; speakers called for transparency while other residents defended council members; the mayor responded and council took no immediate action.
Get email alerts on the Local Government Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the public comment period at the June 16 Matawan Borough Council meeting several residents used their allotted time to air allegations about private political communications and campaign finances.
John Sardo urged residents to review local campaign-finance records and said he had compiled six years of filings showing a steep disparity between Democratic and Republican receipts. Sardo stated detailed figures in open session, asserting that "Democrats brought in $176,715.78" over six years compared with smaller sums reported by Republican organizations. He also read multiple text-message excerpts he said were sent by Councilperson Suzanne Reynolds in 2025 and urged transparency around those communications.
Abby Berg, who said she lives in Matawan, defended Councilperson Reynolds and criticized the meeting time being used for political disputes rather than municipal business. Berg told the council that she has received online threats and said, "Enough is enough," urging the governing body to focus on policy and constituent service.
Other residents, including Dina Gabriel, expressed frustration that meetings are being used to air interpersonal or political disputes instead of discussing budget, property, and service issues they came to hear about. Mayor Joseph Altomonte responded near the end of public comment defending free-speech protections for speakers and restating his earlier remarks on a separate topic; the meeting then moved to executive session with no action taken on the allegations.
No vote or official disciplinary action occurred during the meeting on the matters raised by commenters; those complaints and any records or evidence remain matters for follow-up outside the meeting.

