Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Military Remote Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects proposal to let deployed members vote remotely
Summary
Maumee City Council voted 2–5 to defeat a proposed charter amendment that would have guaranteed deployed council members the right to participate and vote remotely; proponents argued it preserves voters' choices while opponents cited practical concerns about effective participation.
Maumee City Council voted down a proposed amendment to Article 13 of the city charter on June 15 that would have allowed council members serving in the armed forces to participate remotely, including voting, when remote participation is feasible. The motion, moved by Councilman Barrow and considered as an amendment to Ordinance 26-2026, failed on a 2–5 roll call vote.
Proponent Councilman Barrow told colleagues the change was about preserving the authority of an elected official and the voice of voters when a council member is deployed. "A council member serving in the armed forces shall retain the right to participate remotely in council meetings, including voting through electronic or telecommunication means consistent with council rules," Barrow said when presenting his motion. He added that a member could voluntarily relinquish remote participation by sending an electronic notice to council.
Several members voiced practical concerns. One councilor said telecommunications in past meetings were difficult and unreliable for decision-making, noting that participants sometimes could not be heard clearly. Council members also discussed existing charter language regarding temporary replacements after prolonged absences and whether a 90-day window should trigger appointment of an interim. Councilman Kurt emphasized honoring military service but said the mechanics of participation required careful thought.
On the roll call, the motion received yes votes from Kurt and Barrow and no votes from Papa, Son, Bartsy, Gonzalez and Yuki, and the amendment failed. Council President Sun presided over the debate and noted that amendments would require additional readings and possibly emergency procedures if adopted for ballot placement.
With the motion defeated, the council left in place the current charter rules that permit temporary replacement under the vacancy provisions and continue to rely on council rules for telecommunication participation.
