Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mahomet‑Seymour board approves amended 2025–26 budget after hearing on delayed tax distributions

Mahomet-Seymour CUSD 3 Board of Education · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Mahomet‑Seymour CUSD 3 board approved a 2025–26 amended budget after a budget hearing in which Dr. Kaylor said early tax distributions were delayed and the first payment was about $600,000 smaller than the prior year’s first payment; a follow‑up payment expected June 25–26 could prompt another amendment.

The Mahomet‑Seymour CUSD 3 Board of Education on Monday approved an amended 2025–26 budget after a budget hearing in which district finance officials reported timing delays in state and local tax distributions.

Superintendent’s Chief School Business Official Dr. Kaylor told the board that the district’s first tax payment for the fiscal year was about $600,000 less than the same payment last year and that some state revenue collections had been delayed. "We expect another tax payment around June 25 or 26," he said, adding that the board may need to consider a second amendment depending on that next payment.

Board members asked whether the shortfall reflected a permanent revenue drop; Dr. Kaylor said it appears to be a timing issue caused by late submissions of banking information and collection delays, and that overall distributions shown on the tax‑distribution statement remain comparable to last year.

A separate line on the packet’s "red flag" report showed "zero days cash on hand" for May; the entry appeared to be an error that Dr. Kaylor acknowledged and said would be corrected in the next month’s report.

The board moved and approved the amended budget by roll call. Recorded affirmative votes matched the roll‑call sequence in the packet and were reported as unanimous among attending members.