Get email alerts on the Environmental Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council Sends No Name Pond Overlay Back to Planning Board With MDEP-Buffer Language; Public Hearing Set for June 22
Summary
City council returned alternate language on the No Name Pond overlay to the Planning Board and added a provision requiring that any work in the buffer meet MDEP standards; the board will hold a public hearing on June 22 to review the changes.
The Lewiston Planning Board was informed that the City Council revised and returned language for the No Name Pond overlay. Staff said the council removed some proposed changes and added a new section requiring any work in the overlay buffer to meet Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MDEP) standards; the board will hold a public hearing on June 22 to review the revisions.
Chair Shanna Cox said council provided alternative language and staff offered to email the exact redline comparing what the board had recommended and what council sent back. Staff described the edit as the addition of a seventh section rather than changes in the overlay chart; members asked to receive both the amended text and the board’s original recommendation for comparison prior to the June 22 hearing.
Board members asked whether a family wishing to begin construction is still able to break ground while the language is being revised; staff said they did not have an update on that specific construction timeline and would follow up.
The board scheduled a public hearing for its June 22 meeting to consider the council’s revisions, and staff committed to distributing the redline and the prior recommendation to aid board review.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
