Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners debate split award for youth workforce contract and table contract renewal amid performance concerns

Atlantic County Board of Commissioners · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a split award for an out‑of‑school youth workforce contract (adding Jewish Family Services alongside the incumbent) while tabling a separate career services renewal after members raised underperformance concerns and requested performance data before a vote.

The Atlantic County Board of Commissioners approved a competitive contract award for an out‑of‑school youth program under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and separately tabled the renewal of a career services contract after commissioners raised concerns about vendor performance.

During discussion of resolution 301 — a competitive contract described by the clerk as "for the provision of the workforce innovation and opportunity act out of school youth program amount not to exceed $1,120,000" — Commissioner Days said she supported the award but wanted the record to reflect why Jewish Family Services was added to a contract previously held by Ideal Institute. "When I first read it, I thought it was a collapse between Jewish Family Services and ideal," she said, and added that the stated motive for the dual award was to show diversity and to document multiple awards per Department of Labor guidance.

Administration confirmed the procurement rationale: county staff and the workforce development board review responses and the purchasing director oversees procurement posting and evaluation. Administration also said the Department of Labor favors multiple awards in some WIOA procurements to document competition.

Separately, commissioners engaged in a prolonged debate over renewal of a career services contract (resolution 306) with DB/Grant Associates (transcript wording). Multiple commissioners raised concerns that the vendor had "been underperforming for years" and asked whether revoking the contract would interrupt service delivery; administration said staffing issues in a prior year had stabilized and that removing a vendor midstream could disrupt services. Commissioners requested performance data; a motion to table resolution 306 carried by roll call to allow staff to provide current performance reports before the board votes.

Why it matters: The actions affect county workforce‑development programming and the county's procurement practices. Commissioners emphasized showing diversity among subcontractors and documenting competition as required under WIOA, while also pressing administration for measurable performance outcomes before extending or renewing social‑services contracts.

Next steps: Administration said it will provide performance reports and measurable outcomes for the flagged contracts; resolution 306 was tabled to a subsequent meeting so the board can review that data before acting.