Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Plats topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves multiple expedited plats, including Bolo and Darnell filings

Cheyenne City Planning Commission · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved several expedited plats and preliminary plats — Bolo Properties, Polo Properties, Darnell Homesites — advancing each to the governing body with conditions on utilities, road improvements and common‑area maintenance as applicable.

At its May 4 meeting the Cheyenne Planning Commission approved several plats and moved them to the governing body for final action, including an expedited plat for Bolo Properties (multifamily ownership lots), Polo Properties and the Darnell Homesites second filing.

Bolo Properties (PUDC‑26‑52): Agent John Sers described an ownership model of eight fourplex buildings with a ninth common lot for shared maintenance. The development previously received conditional‑use approval for multifamily in the MR zone. Staff (Morgan Dennis) reported the site plan is under review and recommended approval. The commission voted to advance the preliminary plat to the governing body.

Polo Properties (PUDC‑26‑52 referenced in the hearing): The commission moved and seconded approval and the motion passed by roll call.

Darnell Homesites second filing (PUDC‑26‑57): Agent Brandon Swain explained the plat subdivides one lot into five for residential development. Staff and the applicant discussed required improvements to Darnell Place — road widening, curb, gutter and sidewalk along the east frontage — and a Board of Public Utilities request for a wider utility easement to maintain required separation between water and sewer lines. Staff recommended approval with the condition that BOPU’s easement request be satisfied; the commission approved the motion and advanced the plat to the governing body.

Each approval included standard staff‑recommended conditions or exceptions reflecting design or utility requirements; no public comment was offered on these items and roll calls recorded majority affirmative votes for each motion.