Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Survey topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Student commission: housing, mental health and childcare top priorities in youth budget survey
Summary
Youth commissioners presented results of a 2025 student budget survey and a separate higher-education survey: 185 youth responses informed 2026 budget priorities, while a higher-education survey (550 responses) showed 59.7% first-generation students and financial pressures driving attrition.
Members of the student commission and city presenters outlined priorities from two recent surveys that city leaders could use in the 2026 budget cycle.
Vian Virium, a senior at a local school who said they were appointed by a councilmember to the student commission, presented the youth budget-survey overview and recommended partnering with community organizations such as Café College to expand access to childcare, libraries, recreation and mental-health services. “Esto va a reflejar lo que los jóvenes es lo importante para su desarrollo y para éxito a futuro,” Virium said when introducing the commission’s priorities.
The youth budget survey collected 185 responses representing students across the city’s districts and prioritized housing stability, services for people without homes, policing and street cleanup, emergency services and youth-focused library and recreation programs. Presenters said those areas are consistent with students’ needs and recommended stronger outreach and clearer web resources linking students to city and district services.
A related higher-education survey and DHS analysis (conducted through April 2025) gathered 550 responses. Presenters reported that 59.7% of respondents were first-generation college students and that 54% cited financial difficulties as a reason to consider leaving higher education. The commission recommended emergency child-care supports, summer programs, financial-literacy training and better communication about existing city services to improve retention. “El 71.7 por 100 de los estudiantes indicaron que estos recursos pueden mejorar la retención de los estudiantes,” the presentation summary said.
Board members asked whether the youth survey had been conducted before or after the school year; presenters said the youth budget-survey work tied to the city budget was timed around Aug. 27 and recommended conducting outreach earlier in the calendar (April–May) so students can influence budget decisions before the summer.
Presenters and board members agreed on next steps: provide disaggregated data on survey respondents, clarify eligibility criteria for emergency supports and return with a plan to link students to existing services and funding streams. No formal action or vote occurred during the meeting.
The board adjourned at 11:18 a.m.
