Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Town Meeting Warning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board reviews town-meeting warning; debates Australian-ballot items including Richmond Rescue exemption and charitable appropriations
Summary
The board reviewed attorney edits to the town-meeting warning, discussed whether Richmond Rescue’s property-tax exemption should be a floor vote or Australian-ballot item (citing 32 VSA §3840), and agreed to post all charitable appropriation requests online and hold informational sessions before ballots.
Get email alerts on the Town Meeting Warning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Richmond Select Board reviewed an attorney-edited draft of the town-meeting warning and debated which items should be floor votes and which should appear on the Australian ballot.
Staff told the board the attorney recommended separating floor-vote articles from Australian-ballot items for clarity. Several members discussed whether the routine five-year reconsideration of Richmond Rescue’s property-tax exemption should be decided on the floor or by Australian ballot; staff committed to researching prior practice and noted statutory language (cited in the meeting as 32 VSA §3840) that governs exemptions for rescue/ambulance and similar charitable organizations.
Josh said the board will post each charitable appropriation request online and that the appropriation requests and explanatory materials will be available to voters. He also explained that moving these appropriation requests to Australian ballot changes the process from a voice vote at town meeting to an up-or-down ballot decision, which increases voter participation but reduces the opportunity for on-the-spot amendments.
The board discussed the Conservation Commission article (an annual Australian-ballot item) that would add one cent per $100,000 of assessed value to fund the conservation reserve, and staff clarified that if all nine charitable appropriation requests and the conservation article pass, the example presented would add roughly $99,000 to the budget, increasing the estimated municipal tax-rate effect from 6.83% to a higher percentage depending on which items pass.
Board members agreed to post materials on the town website, finalize the warning at the next meeting and schedule at least one (staff proposed two) informational meetings for voters before early voting begins.

