Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Graduation Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges Rogers Board to allow West Point cap toppers at graduation

Rogers Board of Education · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the June Rogers Board of Education meeting, resident Scott McCraary urged the board to reconsider its graduation attire policy after his son's request to wear a West Point cap topper was denied, calling the appointment an 'extraordinary' national achievement and asking the board to revisit the rule.

At the June meeting of the Rogers Board of Education, resident Scott McCraary told the board his son was denied permission to wear a West Point cap topper at graduation and urged the board to change the district policy.

“My son earned an appointment to the United States Military Academy at West Point,” McCraary said during public comment. “An appointment to the service academy is not simply a college acceptance. It's a highly competitive national achievement earned through academic excellence, leadership, character, physical aptitude, and a commitment to serve our country.” He said the district informed the family the topper was not allowed and that a request for an exemption was denied.

McCraary argued the issue is not about a piece of cardboard but about recognizing exceptional achievement and service. “When a student earns an appointment, they have achieved something extraordinary. Rogers Public Schools should be proud to recognize that achievement, not prevent its recognition,” he said.

Board members asked clarifying questions after the comment. One board member asked what the topper looked like; McCraary replied it is a small cardboard cap topper issued by West Point. Board members also asked whether the policy is unique to Rogers or more widely used by other districts, and several thanked McCraary for bringing the matter to their attention.

A board representative said the board would look into the issue, including whether the restriction is a local policy or common elsewhere, and examine possible next steps. No formal motion or vote on changing the graduation-attire policy was made at the meeting.

The board did not make an immediate change to the policy; McCraary urged the board to reconsider the rule so that the achievement would be publicly recognized in future graduations.