Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Longtime educator tells Petersburg board personnel practices are driving teachers away

Petersburg City Public Schools Board · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Vanita Giddings, a contracted STEM educator at Walnut Hill Elementary, accused district leadership of mismanagement, repeated reassignments and a coercive transfer process, and urged the board to address staff treatment and turnover.

A contracted Petersburg City Public Schools educator used three minutes of the public-comment period on June 17 to criticize district personnel practices and warn that mismanagement is prompting educators to leave.

"My name is Vanita Giddings... In a two-year span, I was forced to reapply at least three times for my job as science specialist," Giddings told the board. She described being reassigned to Walnut Hill Elementary as an instructional coach — a placement she said did not match her secondary credentials — and said she was recently informed that her contract would not be renewed and that a transfer had been granted without her consent.

"I did not ask for a transfer, nor do I desire to go back in the classroom," Giddings said. "I was told that if I didn't sign the contract, it meant I resigned. I did not sign." She said the conditions have prompted staff departures and urged board members to review human-resources practices and staff treatment.

Board members responded with expressions of appreciation for her service and asked staff to include a copy of her prepared comments in the meeting record. Superintendent Brown and several board members acknowledged Giddings' remarks and thanked her for raising concerns.

Giddings' comments were part of a broader agenda that included audits, budgets, grants and policy reviews; no board action was taken on the personnel matters she raised during the meeting. The board did agree to an amendment to the personnel agenda later in the meeting to re-add a previously removed item, but the amendment did not address Giddings' specific allegations.