Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Vallejo City Unified board recesses to closed session to consult on litigation and conduct superintendent evaluation

Vallejo City Unified School District Board of Education · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Vallejo City Unified School District Board of Education recessed its June 17 meeting into closed session to consult with legal counsel on an existing litigation (Case No. 2026010841) and to conduct the superintendent’s confidential performance evaluation. No public comments were made for closed session.

The Vallejo City Unified School District Board of Education recessed its June 17 meeting into closed session to consult with legal counsel on an existing litigation, Case No. 2026010841, and to conduct a public employee performance evaluation for the superintendent, board officials said.

The board convened at 4:00 p.m. and established a quorum after roll call. Trustee Fox, Trustee Hodges and Trustee Young were recorded present; Trustee Flores was noted as attending virtually. President Embodden was present. When the board asked for public comment related to the closed session items, a board officer reported, "No public comments."

Board members announced two confidential agenda items. First, the board said it would "confirm with legal counsel regarding existing litigation on one case number 2026010841," indicating the board planned to consult counsel in closed session about that pending matter. Second, the board listed a public employee performance evaluation for the superintendent among closed-session items and described that evaluation as confidential. Officials said both matters would be "reported out in the open session," indicating any formal disclosures would follow the closed session.

The public meeting was recessed to allow the closed-session discussions. The board did not take or announce any votes or other formal actions in open session before recessing; any outcomes from the closed session will be disclosed when the board returns to open session, the board stated.

Meeting materials and the agenda identify the topics but do not include further details about the litigation or the superintendent evaluation in the public record; those specifics were not available in the public portion of the meeting.