Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
River Ridge CDD adopts FY2024/25 budget, approves special assessments
Summary
The River Ridge Community Development District board unanimously adopted its fiscal year 2024/25 budget (Resolution 2024‑07) and a companion resolution imposing special assessments (Resolution 2024‑08) after correcting scrivener errors; no members of the public spoke during the hearings.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The River Ridge Community Development District Board of Supervisors on Aug. 27 adopted its fiscal year 2024/25 budget and a separate resolution imposing special assessments for the coming year.
District Manager Chuck Adams told the board the budget in the published agenda contained errors; staff and supervisors identified scrivener changes, including a corrected description for street‑sweeping. Mrs. Cleo Adams opened the statutorily required public hearing; no affected property owners spoke. On a motion by Supervisor Kurt Blumenthal, seconded by Supervisor Robert Twombly, the board unanimously adopted Resolution 2024‑07, relating to annual appropriations and authorizing budget amendments.
The board then opened a separate public hearing on Resolution 2024‑08, making a determination of benefit and imposing special assessments for fiscal year 2024/25. District Counsel Tony Pires recommended opening the hearing; no property owners spoke. The board directed staff to delete all references to “Exhibit B” from page 2 and elsewhere in the document and, by the same unanimous motion pattern, adopted Resolution 2024‑08 as amended.
Both votes were recorded as unanimous with Mr. Blumenthal moving and Mr. Twombly seconding. The board made clear that the adopted budget will be amended as necessary to correct the identified scrivener issues before publication.
What happens next
Staff will finalize the corrected budget and assessment documents for posting and distribution under the district’s public‑record obligations. The board did not receive substantive objections during the hearings and took formal action to adopt both resolutions.
