Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Codification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews codification of chapters 60–80; seeks fixes for mismatched signs and school crossings
Summary
As part of a broader codification of ordinances, councilmembers identified multiple discrepancies between written code and existing signage (stop/ yield/parking), proposed specific intersection changes and instructed staff to draft ordinance language to align the code with on-the-ground signs.
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Codification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council took up a project to codify chapters 60–80 of the Maxwell code of ordinances and spent substantial time reconciling the written code with actual signage and traffic control in town. Members and staff identified misplaced or missing stop and yield signs, inconsistencies in school-crossing nomenclature and areas where angle versus head-in parking language did not match the on-street configuration.
Specific points included: a recommendation to add yield signs rather than stop signs at two through-street intersections (Woodlon/Second and Woodlon/Third), a proposal to move or correct stop signs so ordinance language matches existing on-street four-way or three-way controls, and plans to remove obsolete references to areas that have been physically changed (for example, sections around the football field and Main Street overnight parking rules). Council also discussed state DOT control of signage on state highways and agreed to avoid conflicting changes on DOT-controlled segments.
Council directed staff to draft ordinance amendments that (1) correct the street listings to reflect current signs, (2) add yield controls on selected intersections instead of full stops where visibility and practice support yield signage, (3) adjust language around school crossing zones, and (4) consolidate parking categories (angle vs. head-in) to match pavement markings. Several proposed edits will return as ordinance language for a future meeting.
No final ordinance adoption occurred at this meeting; the codification project will be revised and brought back for formal approval after staff rewrites per council direction.

