Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission weighs upfront reclamation bonds, buffers and survey as solar projects pressure timelines
Summary
Emery County officials discussed requiring reclamation bonds up front, establishing buffer zones for solar projects, conducting a countywide survey (including a question tying support to potential property tax reductions), and reviewed revenue estimates of roughly $24M–$42M over 20 years while flagging planning and coordination needs.
Commissioners and a presenter discussed future solar development and county responses during the April 8 meeting.
Craig Johansen recommended requiring reclamation bonds up front — rather than years after construction — and suggested the county consider models like SITLA’s approach. He also recommended buffer zones between solar developments and adjacent private properties that do not wish to participate.
Commission discussion acknowledged the validity of those recommendations and confirmed that bond timing and buffer requirements will be reviewed as part of the forthcoming zoning ordinance update. Commissioners expressed concern that timelines tied to expiring federal subsidies could create pressure to approve projects quickly, but they emphasized the need for long‑term planning and regulation rather than rushed approvals.
The commission discussed a countywide survey to gather public input on zoning and solar. Options included mailing to all box holders, posting a QR code on ETV10, and flyers throughout communities. Commissioners raised budget concerns for a mail survey and discussed steps to limit duplicate responses. They agreed to add the question: "If future solar projects would lower your property taxes annually, would you be more in favor of additional solar development in Emery County?" The survey is intended to inform a formal recommendation to the County Commission and feed the zoning ordinance update.
Meeting minutes state projected revenue figures discussed by the commission: existing solar and battery projects were projected to generate approximately $24 million over 20 years; additional proposed projects could increase that to approximately $42 million over 20 years. Commissioners discussed the possibility that revenues could help offset school bond debt or reduce property taxes; an estimated tax‑reduction figure of about 13% was mentioned in discussion but was not presented as a formal estimate or adopted policy.
Next steps: the Planning Commission intends to await survey results before finalizing recommendations and will prepare a formal recommendation to the County Commission on solar development. No binding approvals or agreements were made at the April 8 meeting.
