Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council asks staff to explore Marshall County alternative after concerns about Ames recovery fees
Summary
Facing a per‑capita assessment and a 28% tipping‑fee increase in the Ames Resource Recovery agreement, council asked staff to contact Marshall County’s waste planning commission to compare costs and governance models that would give member communities a voice in waste planning.
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members raised concerns about an apparent per‑capita assessment of $10.50 and a reported ~28% increase in tipping fees tied to the Ames Resource Recovery arrangement. Several councilors said a per‑capita charge may not fairly reflect Maxwell’s actual waste tonnage and suggested fee structures based on service (cans/pickups) would be fairer.
A staff speaker and councilors described Marshall County’s waste planning commission, which grants member communities representation and a voting seat on waste decisions; Marshall County recently accepted several municipalities into its waste zone and may offer a model that returns local control. The council also noted Polk County’s Metro Solid Waste Agency uses a commission model giving communities seats and influence.
Council moved to send representatives (including the mayor or mayor pro tem and other council members) to meet with Marshall County to request rate information and to place the topic on a future meeting agenda for apples‑to‑apples comparison. The motion passed by roll call.
Council directed staff to collect detailed fee schedules, per‑capita versus per‑ton cost comparisons, and to report back so the council can consider options that preserve local influence and fiscal fairness before any formal termination or change in service arrangements.

