Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Private Partnerships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board shares legal opinion with YMCA as town, organization weigh partnership implications
Summary
The Select Board reviewed a Nov. 17 legal opinion on prevailing‑wage implications for a potential YMCA partnership on a community center project and voted to send the opinion to the YMCA’s representatives for their review; town and YMCA representatives agreed to continue dialogue and prepare financial models.
Get email alerts on the Public Private Partnerships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board members reviewed a town legal opinion dated Nov. 17 addressing whether state prevailing‑wage requirements would apply if the town partners with the YMCA to build or operate a community center. Brad Kroll, representing the YMCA, and Stacy Pugh, the YMCA CEO, attended the meeting and were provided an opportunity to respond.
Board members said the legal opinion should be shared with the YMCA so the organization can digest the guidance and return with further questions. Select Board member Jim (last name not specified in the transcript) moved that the legal opinion be shared with Brad Kroll and Stacy Pugh; the motion passed by roll call.
In discussion, board members and the YMCA noted trade‑offs: if the YMCA builds privately on purchased land, prevailing‑wage and some public‑procurement constraints may not apply; if the town contributes funds, land, or significant oversight, prevailing‑wage obligations and procurement rules could apply and raise project costs. Brad Kroll said the YMCA has invested in market studies and will prepare financial models for staff review but will continue pursuing sites until formal direction is given.
Select Board members emphasized the town must rely on its counsel for legal determinations and suggested continued dialog and a return correspondence from the YMCA after it reviews the legal opinion. The board did not make a final commitment to a particular partnership structure; instead it authorized sending the legal memorandum to the YMCA representatives and encouraged follow‑up meetings to clarify parameters and costs.
