Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Soil & Water update: program describes easement costs and urges county support; commissioners to review rollback‑tax option
Summary
Lincoln County Soil and Water staff updated commissioners on conservation easements, explaining typical landowner costs ($15,000–$40,000) and multi‑year timelines; a board supervisor and several commissioners urged exploring use of three‑year rollback tax proceeds to seed an easement fund.
Evan (Lincoln County Soil & Water director) and supervisor George Sain presented the county conservation easement program on June 15, describing technical assistance, federal and state grant support and the multi‑step process to place a preservation easement on farmland.
Evan said the easement work is time‑consuming and typically requires landowner contributions for endowment, surveys, appraisals and closing costs: "it's usually 15 to $40,000 for a landowner to be able to do these things," he said. The presenters noted two completed or in‑process easements and described an ongoing effort to expand program uptake to preserve farmland threatened by development pressure near Charlotte.
Supervisor George Sain shared personal experience farming in Lincoln County and described rising development pressure: he recounted receiving offers much higher than farm value ("They offered me $50,000 an acre for my farm") and urged the county to consider using rollback‑tax receipts when farmland is taken out of agricultural use as a funding source to assist landowners entering easement programs.
Commissioners asked staff whether the county could allocate roll‑back tax proceeds to a local easement fund; staff agreed to research legal and statutory constraints and report back. Several commissioners expressed support for pursuing options to help farmers preserve land without imposing new taxes on residents.
Why it matters: Lincoln County faces rapid farm loss due to proximity to Charlotte and development pressure. Conservation easements are one locally available tool to preserve farmland, but the upfront costs and protracted timelines limit participation. Local funding mechanisms, including reusing roll‑back tax receipts, could expand program reach.
What happens next: Staff will review statutory constraints and practices from peer counties on redirecting rollback tax receipts to fund local easement assistance and return with legal options and recommendations.
Attribution: Quotes and attributions are drawn from the meeting transcript and are attributed to Evan (Soil & Water director) and Mr. George Sain (Soil & Water supervisor).
