Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildlife Conservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Flower Mound board approves 20-house residential ‘owl house’ pilot

Flower Mound Bridal Services Board · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Flower Mound Bridal Services Board voted to approve a pilot to place 20 privately sited owl houses on resident properties, funded by donations and built by volunteers; brochures and outreach will require town-staff review before production.

The Flower Mound Bridal Services Board voted to approve a Phase 1 pilot to place 20 residential owl houses on private properties, with materials donated and volunteer builders, after a presentation and questions about logistics and legal review.

The board heard a presentation from a Bridal Services subcommittee that said the pilot—branded informally as "WooHoo" or "owl in the hood"—is intended to support local screech-owl populations, provide natural rodent control, and increase community engagement. "We are talking about an owl house project," the presenter said, explaining that the pilot would start with 20 properties and rely on donated building materials and an Eagle Scout troop to construct the boxes.

Board members pressed presenters on implementation details. The subcommittee said the pilot would place boxes only on private property, not town land, and that volunteers would cover construction and initial outreach costs. The presenter said David (a volunteer) will survey candidate yards for suitability and that the group has seven residents already signed up. The subcommittee recommended using the town's social media and the utilities mailer for outreach, provided materials and language are approved in advance by town staff and legal review.

On timing and success measures, presenters and members noted uncertainty: the optimal installation window was identified as September for local nesting activity, but an owl may not adopt a new box for a year or more. The board agreed the pilot’s success metrics—such as adoption rate or duration an owl uses a box—should be defined after the houses are in place and monitored.

A motion to approve the pilot program, to proceed with awareness and communications in parallel, and to obtain town-staff approval for brochures before distribution was moved and seconded. The board voted to approve the recommendation.

The pilot, as described by the subcommittee, is meant to cost the town no direct funds: materials and construction are planned to be covered by donations and volunteers. The presentation also noted an aspirational long-term goal: if the town ultimately hosts a certain threshold of owl houses (a number cited in the discussion as about 137), there may be unspecified additional benefits for the town; presenters said the exact benefit was not specified.

The board asked staff to confirm whether town legal review is required for informational brochures that include construction instructions; presenters agreed the draft materials are not yet production-ready and will go through staff and legal review before wider distribution. Next steps noted by the subcommittee include outreach to other boards and commissions, establishing a shortlist of 20 participating properties, and defining pilot evaluation criteria.