Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Colfax council adopts balanced FY 2026–27 budget, agrees to revisit $30,000 community allocation

Colfax City Council · June 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Colfax City Council adopted a balanced FY 2026–27 operating budget that staffs said relies on steady sales-tax receipts and includes $501,000 for capital and transfers. Council directed staff to return with a refined plan for how to allocate a $30,000 community/economic-development fund.

The Colfax City Council on June 5 adopted a balanced FY 2026–27 operating budget projecting $3.45 million in revenue and approximately $3.29 million in general fund expenditures.

Katrina Olsen, the city’s administrative services officer, presented the budget, saying the city ends FY 2025–26 “in a very strong position” with a year-end estimate of $3.46 million and that sales tax accounts for roughly 55% of general fund revenue. The proposed budget would maintain current service levels while funding a modest set of capital projects and reserve allocations.

Staff outlined key assumptions: a 3.58% cost-of-living adjustment for employees, a small safety-pay increase, a 12% rise in health benefit costs, and $501,000 earmarked for capital and transfers to address infrastructure needs. Olsen said the budget reflects a transition from a two-year cycle to an annual cycle to improve forecasting and align with a new financial system.

Council discussion focused on how to handle a $30,000 pool of council-directed funds that staff had separated into two line items in the proposed budget—$15,000 categorized for events and $15,000 for economic development. Several council members said they prefer to keep the $30,000 intact and determine allocations later. City Attorney David Rudman clarified that workshop direction can be given to staff but final budget decisions rest with the council at a noticed meeting.

After deliberation, a motion to adopt the FY 2026–27 budget passed on a voice vote; no opposition was recorded during the roll call on the motion. The council directed staff to return with a revised presentation reconciling the community/economic-development and events line items for formal review.

The budget package presented included a capital improvement program for $390,000 in near-term projects, ongoing wastewater fund projections (no rate increase proposed), and a recommended strategy to allocate the prior-year surplus across capital replacement, pension obligations and operating reserves. Olsen recommended adoption to maintain service levels and address long-term infrastructure needs.

The council’s next step is for staff to bring back the reworked funding-line presentation for the $30,000 community allocation and any requested line-item clarifications.