Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Porterville council sends two charter amendments to November ballot on procurement and vacancy rules
Summary
The council voted to place two charter amendments on the Nov. 3 ballot: one to consolidate local control over public works and procurement, and another to require special elections for vacancies with one year or more remaining. The measures each carry an estimated $35,000 election cost.
The Porterville City Council voted to submit two proposed amendments to the city charter to the Nov. 3, 2026 ballot after a months-long charter-review effort.
The first proposed amendment would repeal current Section 61 and replace it with language allowing the council to decide whether public works, repair, maintenance and construction should be performed by city forces, through contracts, or via agreements with other public agencies. Staff described the change as aligning the charter with modern public-works practice and giving the city explicit authority to self-perform work.
The second amendment would change how council vacancies are filled: if less than one year remains in an unexpired term the council would appoint a successor; if one year or more remains the vacancy would be filled by special election. Supporters said the change restores voters' ability to choose a representative when a substantial portion of a term remains.
Council debate focused on trade-offs. Vice Mayor Mccurvy argued the procurement amendment would give the city necessary flexibility and the vacancy amendment would restore voter control. "That is powerful," he said of the proposed local-control language. Councilman Beltran questioned whether the charter-review committee had solicited enough public input and flagged the $35,000 per-measure election cost, asking whether the end product justified the expense. "Is it worth the $70,000 for the two measures?" he asked.
At least one public commenter who identified herself as a former procurement official warned the council that the procurement amendment, as written, does not define bidding thresholds, required independent cost analyses, or specific safeguards and urged the council to spell out guardrails before asking voters to cede authority.
The council approved placing both measures on the ballot by a 4-1 vote with Councilman Beltran abstaining. Staff said the city has included funding for the election costs in the adopted FY2026-27 budget and will undertake outreach and materials for voters.
What happens next: the city clerk will prepare ballot materials and an outreach plan; council and staff said they will provide informational materials to explain how the charter language would operate if approved.
