Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Building Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectmen to clarify school building committee membership after attorney advises ex‑officio limits
Summary
A resident asked whether unelected ex‑officio members may sit on the school building committee; the town attorney advised the charter favors elected officials in ex‑officio roles and recommended using 'non‑voting advisory participants' for non‑elected members. The board will revisit language at the next meeting.
A resident raised a question about whether the town could appoint unelected ex‑officio members to a school building committee. The board discussed the matter on June 17 and said the town attorney reviewed the charter language.
According to the attorney’s advice relayed at the meeting, the charter’s wording implies ex‑officio positions should be held by elected officials. The attorney suggested an alternative label to preserve participation while complying with the charter: list non‑elected people as "non‑voting advisory participants" rather than ex‑officio members. The board agreed to bring formal, revised language and a legal explanation to the next meeting before making any changes.
Board members noted different readings of the charter and emphasized clarity is important for a multi‑year school building project. One selectman said the board can include necessary participants as long as the resolution’s phrasing makes their role advisory and non‑voting.
Why it matters: The composition and legal standing of a school building committee shape which officials and staff advise a major, multi‑year capital project. Labeling affects participation rights and public‑meeting obligations under the charter.
Next step: The board asked the attorney to provide a written explanation and to draft proposed wording for the July meeting so the board can consider amendments or post changes for public comment before a vote.
