Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Contractors topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Washington County weighs limits on contractors’ yards concentrated in Basalt Creek and Coffee Creek
Summary
Staff told the Planning Commission it identified 66 contractors’ establishments countywide — 54 inside the urban growth boundary and 32 in Wilsonville’s planning area — and proposed outreach and code concepts aimed at limiting intensity in FD20 holding zones to protect future industrial plans and neighboring residents.
At its June 17 meeting, Washington County planning staff presented a work session on contractors’ establishments — heavy‑equipment storage yards and related operations concentrated near Basalt Creek and Coffee Creek — and recommended drafting code concepts and targeted outreach ahead of a proposed ordinance in spring 2027.
Associate planner Peter Grine told commissioners staff had compiled an inventory identifying “66 confirmed or, you know, suspected contractors' establishments in the county,” with 54 located inside the urban growth boundary and 32 concentrated in Wilsonville’s planning area. Grine said many of those sites have expanded onto adjacent tax lots and, in some cases, now resemble near‑industrial operations rather than short‑term interim uses.
The presentation traced the county’s regulatory history, noting that Section 43034 of the Community Development Code added rural square‑footage limits in 2003 but that FD10 and FD20 future development districts lack the same special‑use standards. Grine said that gap helps explain why the FD20 holding districts have attracted contractor yards that can intensify without the infrastructure investments a full industrial development would require.
Staff reported enforcement challenges: code compliance staff have issued 18 use violations for unpermitted operations, vehicle storage that exceeded permit conditions, unpermitted grading and vegetation removal, but enforcement is complaint‑driven. “The county does not conduct proactive code enforcement and relies on complaints to spur investigations,” Grine said.
Commissioners raised a series of concerns during a lengthy Q&A about equity for existing operators, the cost of retrofitting sites or permitting, impacts on bids for infrastructure projects and the practicality of moving contractors to other zones. Commissioner Carlson warned that “if we do things to make these more expensive, … their bids for roads, for homes, for infrastructure is going to go up,” urging staff to prioritize outreach rather than immediate punitive measures.
Staff outlined possible next steps: develop draft CDC definitions and standards for contractors’ establishments in FD20, conduct outreach to property owners and operators in Basalt Creek and Coffee Creek, coordinate with Wilsonville and Tualatin where applicable, and consider measures that would apply to unpermitted sites or to expansions after adoption. Grine said new regulations would not automatically apply to legally permitted, existing operations but could be enforced when sites expand or are operating without permits.
When asked about permitting costs, planning staff said a Type 3 land‑use review is deposit‑based and “that initial deposit … would be upwards of $10,000,” not counting other permits or any infrastructure work local jurisdictions might require, a county staff member said.
Staff recommended balancing the county’s need for workable interim storage sites with Wilsonville’s interest in preserving FD20 for future industrial development after annexation. Commissioners requested more data on property ownership patterns, examples from other jurisdictions, and outreach plans. Staff said they will return with code concepts and stakeholder outreach before filing an ordinance in 2027.
The Planning Commission did not take any formal action at the session; the presentation concluded and commissioners moved on to routine minutes and adjournment.
